<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jñānāgni &#187; Ramakrishna</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jnanagni.com/tag/ramakrishna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jnanagni.com</link>
	<description>The Fire of Wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:46:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Formless God, or God with form?</title>
		<link>http://jnanagni.com/2009/07/formless-god-or-god-with-form/</link>
		<comments>http://jnanagni.com/2009/07/formless-god-or-god-with-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Srini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advaita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dvaita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formless God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God with form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramakrishna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swami Brahmeshananda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnanagni.com/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: Sometimes I like to meditate upon formless God and sometimes with form. Which is the right one? Swami Brahmeshananda: A great saint used to recommend that if you can meditate on the formless aspect, well and good. If you can&#8217;t, imagine that there is a formless light all around which has taken the form [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Question: Sometimes I like to meditate upon formless God and sometimes with form. Which is the right one?</p>
<p>Swami Brahmeshananda: A great saint used to recommend that if you can meditate on the formless aspect, well and good. If you can&#8217;t, imagine that there is a formless light all around which has taken the form of your chosen deity. Then, meditate on Him and at the end of meditation, again merge the form into the formless.</p>
<p>(From the July 2009 issue of <a href="http://www.sriramakrishnamath.org/Magazine/Displaymagazine.aspx?Lang_Type=Eng"><em>The Vedanta Kesari</em></a>)
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Think of Brahman, Existence-Knowledge-Bliss Absolute, as a shoreless ocean. Through the cooling influence, as it were, of the bhakta&#8217;s love, the water has frozen at places into blocks of ice. In other words, God now and then assumes various forms for His lovers and reveals Himself to them as a Person. But with the rising of the sun of Knowledge, the blocks of ice melt. Then one doesn&#8217;t feel any more that God is a Person, nor does one see God&#8217;s forms. What He is cannot be described. Who will describe Him? He who would do so disappears. He cannot find his &#8216;I&#8217; any more.</p>
<p>(<em>The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna</em>, p. 148)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jnanagni.com/2009/07/formless-god-or-god-with-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Be free from all dualities</title>
		<link>http://jnanagni.com/2009/01/be-free-from-all-dualities/</link>
		<comments>http://jnanagni.com/2009/01/be-free-from-all-dualities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Srini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bhagavad Gita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oneness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramakrishna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swami Vivekananda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoga Vasishtha]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnanagni.com/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Narendra — All is one, isn’t it? Sri Ramakrishna — No, beyond one and two. (source) When the mind perceives duality then there is both duality and its counterpart, which is unity. When the mind drops the perception of duality there is neither duality nor unity. When one is firmly established in the oneness of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Narendra — All is one, isn’t it?</p>
<p>Sri Ramakrishna — No, beyond one and two.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://kathamrita.org/kathamrita/k1sec16.htm">source</a>)</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>When the mind perceives duality then there is both duality and its counterpart, which is unity. <strong>When the mind drops the perception of duality there is neither duality nor unity.</strong> When one is firmly established in the oneness of the infinite consciousness, whether he is quiet or actively engaged in work, then he is considered to be at peace with himself.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">— Yoga Vāsiṣṭha (<a href="http://mlbd.com/BookDecription.aspx?id=8926">tr. by Swami Venkatesananda</a>, p.66)</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The Vedas deal mainly with the subject of the three modes of material nature. O Arjuna, become transcendental to these three modes. <strong>Be free from all dualities</strong> and from all anxieties for gain and safety, and be established in the self.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">— Bhagavad Gita 2.45</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jnanagni.com/2009/01/be-free-from-all-dualities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The one religion</title>
		<link>http://jnanagni.com/2008/10/the-one-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://jnanagni.com/2008/10/the-one-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Srini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bernard Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahatma Gandhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oneness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramakrishna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swami Vivekananda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnanagni.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;There is only one religion, though there are a hundred versions of it.&#8221; ~ George Bernard Shaw &#8220;We want to lead mankind in the place where there is neither the Vedas, nor the Bible, nor the Koran; yet this is to be done by harmonizing the Vedas, the Bible and the Koran. Mankind ought to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;border:1px solid #ddd; padding:2px; margin:0 0 10px 10px;"><img src="http://jnanagni.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/one-world-religion1.jpg" alt="" title="One World Religion" width="167" height="169" class="size-full wp-image-114" /></div>
<p>&#8220;There is only one religion, though there are a hundred versions of it.&#8221; ~ George Bernard Shaw</p>
<p>&#8220;We want to lead mankind in the place where there is neither the Vedas, nor the Bible, nor the Koran; yet this is to be done by harmonizing the Vedas, the Bible and the Koran. Mankind ought to be taught that religions are but the varied expressions of <em>The Religion</em>, which is Oneness, so that each may choose that path that suits him best.&#8221; ~ Swami Vivekananda</p>
<p>&#8220;The candles are many, but the light is one.&#8221; ~ Rumi</p>
<p>&#8220;Truth is one; only It is called by different names. All people are seeking the same Truth; the variance is due to climate, temperament, and name. A lake has many ghats. From one ghat the Hindus take water in jars and call it &#8216;jal&#8217;. From another ghat the Mussalmāns take water in leather bags and call it &#8216;pāni&#8217;. From a third the Christians take the same thing and call it &#8216;water&#8217;. Suppose someone says that the thing is not &#8216;jal&#8217; but &#8216;pāni&#8217;, or that it is not &#8216;pāni&#8217; but &#8216;water&#8217;, or that it is not &#8216;water&#8217; but &#8216;jal&#8217;, It would indeed be ridiculous. But this very thing is at the root of the friction among sects, their misunderstandings and quarrels. This is why people injure and kill one another, and shed blood, in the name of religion. But this is not good. Everyone is going toward God. They will all realize Him if they have sincerity and longing of heart.&#8221; ~ Ramakrishna Paramahamsa</p>
<p>&#8220;I came to the conclusion long ago … that all religions were true and also that all had some error in them, and whilst I hold by my own, I should hold others as dear as Hinduism. So we can only pray, if we are Hindus, not that a Christian should become a Hindu … But our innermost prayer should be a Hindu should be a better Hindu, a Muslim a better Muslim, a Christian a better Christian.&#8221; ~ M. K. Gandhi</p>
<p>&#8220;All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree.&#8221; ~ Albert Einstein</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jnanagni.com/2008/10/the-one-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
